Monday, July 31, 2006
2 hour C-SPAN Physics Scholars prove 911 WTC demolished with Thermate!
After waiting a long time C-SPAN finally releases the very controversial Alex Jones 911 symposium with PROOF that WTC demolition was an INSIDE JOB based on scientific evidence. Every person in America needs to see this C-SPAN video! It is about 2 hours.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Diggnation Episode 55 - July 21, 2006
| TMNT trailer, Calacanis to pay top digg users, Yahoo unrestricted MP3 downloads, Google launches free wifi for trusted users, Joel Sigel Kevin Smith, Apple to announce iTunes movie rentals, MySpace hack, Details of AOL customer retention manual | |
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
How to stop WW III - A historic 2 hour video talk given by Webster Tarpley
This is excellent talk given by Webster Tarpley on the current state of affairs that are certainly leading the US to start WW III, intentionally. This talk covers many of the current details related to Bush Administration intentions in the middle east including Lebanon and Israel.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Is Melinda French Gates the wealthiest person alive?
Free Energy - Zero-Point Energy Extraction from the Quantum Vacuum
| This is Tom Valone's amazing video lecture Zero-Point Energy Extraction from the Quantum Vacuum (2004) where he gives a great overview of the various methods to extract free energy directly from the quantum vacuum to power our homes and machines. Today we face a destabilizing dependency on irreplaceable fossil fuels which are also rapidly dwindling. A real need exists for a portable source of power that can compete with fossil fuel and its energy density. A further need exists for a fuelless source of power which, by definition, does not require re-fueling. One possible source could be zero-point energy (ZPE). A major feasibility study by Valone's Integrity Research Institute placed its emphasis on the practical potential for ZPE energy conversion, especially in view of recent advances in nanotechnology, than in the theory. With primary reference to the works of Casimir, Pinto, Mead and Milonni, key principles for the proposed extraction of energy for useful work are identified and analyzed. These principles fall into the thermodynamic, fluidic, mechanical, and electromagnetic areas of primary, forcelike quantities that apply to all energy systems. A search of ZPE literature reveals that these principles also apply to the quantum level. | |
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Olbermann on O'Reilly's Malmedy problems
Bill O'Reilly SUCKS!
Bill O'Reilly SUCKS!
Monday, July 24, 2006
Apple Computer's CEO, Steve Jobs announces plans to stay in Cupertino
| Apple Computer's CEO, Steve Jobs, announces to the Cupertino City Council Apple's plan to build another campus in Cupertino after looking at other location opportunities. | |
Microsoft Exec: Vista Slip Could Mean $200 To $400 Million Hit
Company CFO Chris Liddell says a slip in Vista's release to Q2 2007 would cost the company hundreds of millions, but it's unclear whether the estimated loss includes some of the planned sales and marketing money--estimated at $900 million total for fiscal 2007.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Condi Rice snubs Lebanese President during dangerous visit to Beirut
Rice avoided the President of Lebanon during her visit. Rice used terms such as "New Lebanon" and in a prior speech on Friday "Birth pains for the new Middle East". Yet claims to prevent "interference from foreigners" which is contradictory to her directing reformation. For example, Rice favors Siniora who is considered a reformer
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Mosaic Special Report: Insight into the Middle East July 20, 2006
| Mosaic Special Report: Insight into the Middle East July 20, 2006 Link TV's team of journalists and Middle East experts answered call-in questions and e-mails about what's really happening in the current crisis. Drawing on reports from 28 Middle Eastern news broadcasts, Link TV provides context, analysis and a behind the scenes look at the story you never see on American TV. Stewart Cheifet - Moderator Mr. Cheifet has been a broadcast journalist for nearly forty years. Jamal Dajani - Guest Award-winning producer and the Director of Middle Eastern Programming at Link TV Michael Jacobs - Guest An attorney and former US foreign service officer, Mr. Jacobs is an officer for the Jewish Community Federation. George Bisharat - Guest Professor of law at Hastings College of the Law in San Francisco. Included are reports from: IBA TV, Israel; Future TV, Lebanon; Abu Dhabi TV, UAE; Oman TV, Oman; LBC TV, Lebanon; Al Jazeera TV, Quatar; IRIB TV, Iran; Palestine TV, Gaza Link TV is an independent national network providing Americans a global perspective on world issues and cultures, now available in one out of four US homes. | |
The framing of Hizbullah - Must understand what's going on in the Middle East
The framing of Hizbullah
Israel's response to its soldiers' capture is part of a hamfisted attempt to redraw the region's map
Amal Saad-Ghorayeb in Beirut
Saturday July 15, 2006
The Guardian
The capture of three Israeli soldiers by the Lebanese resistance movement, Hizbullah, to bargain for prisoner exchange should come as no surprise - least of all to Israel, which must bear its own responsibility for the abductions and is using this conflict to pursue its wider strategic aims.
The prisoners Hizbullah wants released are hostages who were taken on Lebanese soil. In the successful prisoner exchange in 2004, Israel held on to three Lebanese detainees as bargaining chips and to keep the battle front with Hizbullah open. These detentions have become a cause celebre in Lebanon. In a recent poll, efforts to effect their release attracted majority support, much more even than the liberation of Shebaa Farms, the disputed corridor of land between Syria and Lebanon still occupied by Israel.
The domestic significance of these hostages is ignored by those who choose to reduce the abductions to an act of solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. Indeed Israel's media are aware of recent attempts to capture soldiers, including a botched attempt a few months ago in which three Hizbullah fighters were killed. Hizbullah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, confirmed the attack took five months to plan. Its timing was probably a coincidence. It would seem, though, Hizbullah exerts some influence over the fighters in Gaza - those who captured Corporal Shalit were at the very least inspired by Hizbullah.
The regional significance of the abductions has also been misconstrued. To suggest Hizbullah attacked on the orders of Tehran and Damascus is to grossly oversimplify a strong strategic and ideological relationship. Historically there has been an overlap of interests between Syria, Iran, Hizbullah and Hamas. Together they form a strategic axis - the "axis of terror" to Israel - that confronts US-Israeli designs to redraw the map of the region.
But the nature of that relationship has changed much over the years. Since Syrian forces left Lebanon, Hizbullah has become the stronger party. It has never allowed any foreign power to dictate its military strategy.
It is ironic, given Israel's bombing of civilian targets in Beirut, that Hizbullah is often dismissed in the west as a terrorist organisation. In fact its military record is overwhelmingly one of conflict with Israeli forces inside Lebanese territory. This is just an example of the way that the west employs an entirely different definition of terrorism to the one used in the Arab world and elsewhere, where there is a recognition that terrorism can come in many forms.
The attempt to frame Hizbullah as a terrorist organisation is very far from political reality in Lebanon, from public opinion across the Arab and Islamic world, and from international law.
Israel's disproportionate response to the soldiers' capture will have an impact on Lebanese domestic policy. Hizbullah has recently proposed a comprehensive national defence strategy; the Lebanese government has yet to come up with anything similarly convincing. If demands for a prisoner exchange are successful then it shows that what Hizbullah would term the logic of resistance is the most effective defence strategy. Israel's escalation has been a poor PR exercise. Even if it succeeds in showing the Lebanese people that Hizbullah can be a liability, this may well be cancelled out by Israel's own aggression, which will only confirm Hizbullah's repeated warnings of the constant threat posed by Israel.
ยท Amal Saad-Ghorayeb is assistant professor of political science at the Lebanese-America University.
a.sghorayeb@gmail.com
Israel's response to its soldiers' capture is part of a hamfisted attempt to redraw the region's map
Amal Saad-Ghorayeb in Beirut
Saturday July 15, 2006
The Guardian
The capture of three Israeli soldiers by the Lebanese resistance movement, Hizbullah, to bargain for prisoner exchange should come as no surprise - least of all to Israel, which must bear its own responsibility for the abductions and is using this conflict to pursue its wider strategic aims.
The prisoners Hizbullah wants released are hostages who were taken on Lebanese soil. In the successful prisoner exchange in 2004, Israel held on to three Lebanese detainees as bargaining chips and to keep the battle front with Hizbullah open. These detentions have become a cause celebre in Lebanon. In a recent poll, efforts to effect their release attracted majority support, much more even than the liberation of Shebaa Farms, the disputed corridor of land between Syria and Lebanon still occupied by Israel.
The domestic significance of these hostages is ignored by those who choose to reduce the abductions to an act of solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza. Indeed Israel's media are aware of recent attempts to capture soldiers, including a botched attempt a few months ago in which three Hizbullah fighters were killed. Hizbullah's leader, Hassan Nasrallah, confirmed the attack took five months to plan. Its timing was probably a coincidence. It would seem, though, Hizbullah exerts some influence over the fighters in Gaza - those who captured Corporal Shalit were at the very least inspired by Hizbullah.
The regional significance of the abductions has also been misconstrued. To suggest Hizbullah attacked on the orders of Tehran and Damascus is to grossly oversimplify a strong strategic and ideological relationship. Historically there has been an overlap of interests between Syria, Iran, Hizbullah and Hamas. Together they form a strategic axis - the "axis of terror" to Israel - that confronts US-Israeli designs to redraw the map of the region.
But the nature of that relationship has changed much over the years. Since Syrian forces left Lebanon, Hizbullah has become the stronger party. It has never allowed any foreign power to dictate its military strategy.
It is ironic, given Israel's bombing of civilian targets in Beirut, that Hizbullah is often dismissed in the west as a terrorist organisation. In fact its military record is overwhelmingly one of conflict with Israeli forces inside Lebanese territory. This is just an example of the way that the west employs an entirely different definition of terrorism to the one used in the Arab world and elsewhere, where there is a recognition that terrorism can come in many forms.
The attempt to frame Hizbullah as a terrorist organisation is very far from political reality in Lebanon, from public opinion across the Arab and Islamic world, and from international law.
Israel's disproportionate response to the soldiers' capture will have an impact on Lebanese domestic policy. Hizbullah has recently proposed a comprehensive national defence strategy; the Lebanese government has yet to come up with anything similarly convincing. If demands for a prisoner exchange are successful then it shows that what Hizbullah would term the logic of resistance is the most effective defence strategy. Israel's escalation has been a poor PR exercise. Even if it succeeds in showing the Lebanese people that Hizbullah can be a liability, this may well be cancelled out by Israel's own aggression, which will only confirm Hizbullah's repeated warnings of the constant threat posed by Israel.
ยท Amal Saad-Ghorayeb is assistant professor of political science at the Lebanese-America University.
a.sghorayeb@gmail.com
How to stop WW III - A historic 2 hour video talk given by Webster Tarpley
This is excellent talk given by Webster Tarpley on the current state of affairs that are certainly leading the US to start WW III, intentionally. This talk covers many of the current details related to Bush Administration intentions in the middle east including Lebanon and Israel.
read more | digg story
read more | digg story
Webster Tarpley - The 9/11 issue - How to stop World War III
| Webster Tarpley in New York on January 15, 2006. The 9/11 issue - How to stop World War III. Everybody should read his latest book called This was an amazing presentation and should be fed to everyone on the planet 24/7. | |
Sunday, July 23, 2006
An hour long smorgasbord of content from Louder Than Words
| A presentation of both the actions of Louder Than Words and a preview of content from Loose Change: Final Cut which was intended for broadcast at the 9/11 Truth Chicago Conference but later deemed unnecessary due to miscommunication. | |
Melinda French Gates, The wealthiest person alive, Something Smells Fishy
1) She's a Bilderberg member
2) She's the richest person in the world (not bill)
3) In Bilderberg, shes the youngest by at least 10 years
4) She's good looking. Remember, she married bill for some reason
5) She's not nerdy. What made her fall for bill, other than wealth.
6) When I see Bill and Melinda together, it reminds me of Anna Nicole Smith, for some reason.
Now, I get serious.
1) She's in Bilderberg group, friends with Rockefeller, Roman Catholic (->Jesuit -> Masonic -> NWO)
2) What caught my attention is:
- Warren Buffet, second wealthiest person on the planet, self proclaimed tight wad, decides to give away 80% of his wealth to Melinda French (this would be the effect if Bill is no longer with her).
- Although Bill and Warren play Bridge, Warren is more connected with Melinda French as described below:
1) Bill only became "friends" with Warren after married to Melinda. 1993 or thereabouts.
2) Melinda is a Director of the Washington Post, which is owned by Warren. This makes her employed by Warren. Bill is on the board of Berkshire, but I think Melinda has a more direct association to Warren as an employee. She is not a Microsoft Employee now.
I dont believe:
- Gates is philanthropic (see his books, see how much he has not spoke of thes ideas in the past).
- W. Buffet is too stingy to make such a "rash" move. I would have been more believable if it were more gradual, before making such a public commitment.
Psych Job done on Warren Buffet:
I have a theory that Warren Buffet is under the influence of Melinda French for the following possible reasons:
1) He is still mourning the death of is long time wife Susan Thompson and significant marriage. This is very significant at age 75; this makes Warren Buffet more vulnerable because of loneliness and lack of closeness he's grown accustomed to.
2) There seems to be some transference of some of these emotions to Bill and Melinda.
3) There appeared to be some disassociation and distance with his decendents.
4) Notice that Bill Gates is the same age as Warren Buffet's son Howard Buffet. The relationship Warren Buffet has with Bill Gates seems to be the relationship Warren Buffet should have with his own son Howard Buffet.
Scary current events:
In rapid succession, the following took place all in June.
0) 4/18/06 - Bill Gates is visited by China President Hu JinTao
1) 6/15/06 - Bill Gates resigns from Microsoft.
2) 6/16/06 - George Bush visits Bill Gates (Medina, WA)
3) 6/26/06 - Warren Buffet gives his fortune to Melinda French (She now controls 100 Billion dollars!), Meeting was attended by David Rockefeller (Bilderberg group, Bohemian Club member and founder of Trilateral commission and Council on Foreign Relations all secret societies).
So, my focus is Melinda French.
1) She controls the largest fortune on the planet (100 Billion Dollars).
2) She's a Roman Catholic -> Jesuit -> origin of all Masonic societies (Military religion) NWO
3) Bill Gates is an athiest but associated with Lucis Trust. (Redmond, WA is a hotspot of Paganism).
2) She's the richest person in the world (not bill)
3) In Bilderberg, shes the youngest by at least 10 years
4) She's good looking. Remember, she married bill for some reason
5) She's not nerdy. What made her fall for bill, other than wealth.
6) When I see Bill and Melinda together, it reminds me of Anna Nicole Smith, for some reason.
Now, I get serious.
1) She's in Bilderberg group, friends with Rockefeller, Roman Catholic (->Jesuit -> Masonic -> NWO)
2) What caught my attention is:
- Warren Buffet, second wealthiest person on the planet, self proclaimed tight wad, decides to give away 80% of his wealth to Melinda French (this would be the effect if Bill is no longer with her).
- Although Bill and Warren play Bridge, Warren is more connected with Melinda French as described below:
1) Bill only became "friends" with Warren after married to Melinda. 1993 or thereabouts.
2) Melinda is a Director of the Washington Post, which is owned by Warren. This makes her employed by Warren. Bill is on the board of Berkshire, but I think Melinda has a more direct association to Warren as an employee. She is not a Microsoft Employee now.
I dont believe:
- Gates is philanthropic (see his books, see how much he has not spoke of thes ideas in the past).
- W. Buffet is too stingy to make such a "rash" move. I would have been more believable if it were more gradual, before making such a public commitment.
Psych Job done on Warren Buffet:
I have a theory that Warren Buffet is under the influence of Melinda French for the following possible reasons:
1) He is still mourning the death of is long time wife Susan Thompson and significant marriage. This is very significant at age 75; this makes Warren Buffet more vulnerable because of loneliness and lack of closeness he's grown accustomed to.
2) There seems to be some transference of some of these emotions to Bill and Melinda.
3) There appeared to be some disassociation and distance with his decendents.
4) Notice that Bill Gates is the same age as Warren Buffet's son Howard Buffet. The relationship Warren Buffet has with Bill Gates seems to be the relationship Warren Buffet should have with his own son Howard Buffet.
Scary current events:
In rapid succession, the following took place all in June.
0) 4/18/06 - Bill Gates is visited by China President Hu JinTao
1) 6/15/06 - Bill Gates resigns from Microsoft.
2) 6/16/06 - George Bush visits Bill Gates (Medina, WA)
3) 6/26/06 - Warren Buffet gives his fortune to Melinda French (She now controls 100 Billion dollars!), Meeting was attended by David Rockefeller (Bilderberg group, Bohemian Club member and founder of Trilateral commission and Council on Foreign Relations all secret societies).
So, my focus is Melinda French.
1) She controls the largest fortune on the planet (100 Billion Dollars).
2) She's a Roman Catholic -> Jesuit -> origin of all Masonic societies (Military religion) NWO
3) Bill Gates is an athiest but associated with Lucis Trust. (Redmond, WA is a hotspot of Paganism).
Saturday, July 22, 2006
Apple Computer's CEO, Steve Jobs announces plans to stay in Cupertino
| Apple Computer's CEO, Steve Jobs, announces to the Cupertino City Council Apple's plan to build another campus in Cupertino after looking at other location opportunities. | |
Friday, July 21, 2006
World War III is being orchestrated by the Bush Administration and Condi Rice
Condi Rice today announced plans to meet with Prince Bandar and Saud al-Faisal to discuss plans for the Middle East. Well, that is a rediculously broad agenda. Quite frankly, I'm extremely uncomfortable with any decisions made by Condi Rice, George Bush, Bandar, or Saud. As you know, Bandar's wife was suspected of paying alegeded 911 hijackers. The investigation ended when the Kean omission report disavowed the notion without any reasons.I don't trust Bandar because of his connection to Osama Basnan who praised the WTC 93 attackers. Bandar flowed at least $15,000 (probably more) to Basnan under Bandar's wife's name (Princess Haifa), and much more totaling more than $50,000 using the Riggs Bank prior to September 11. See the full account at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haifa_bint_FaisalThere are even more reasons that Bandar's full access to Condi Rice and George Bush should be prohibited, including the claims made (and never refuted) against Bandar in the movie Fahrenheit 911.Near the end of this c-span.org press conference: rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/intl/intl072106_state.rm?mode=compactCondi Rice calls the conflict between Israel and Hezbollah as "Birth pains of a new Middle East" (at 11:00 in the c-span recording) when explaining why she would not meet with Hezbollah and she would not accept simple arrangments even if that would reduce the current violence. That sucks! I mean, that is Bush-esq in that it says: People are dying, but let them continue to die, because the US (independent of the conflict) doesnt like simple solutions because they don't lead to what the US wants (actual, what the Bush Administration wants the agreement to yield, not necessarily what the American People want.) This is all spoke of by Rice at 19:00 in the c-span.org recording.The Bush Admininistration (not the US) is practicing Imperialism, Facism, and basically acting outside of the desires and will of the US.The big problem is this appears to be directing the entire conflict towards WW III !!! That's no exaggeration!
